Dr. Hall, you have kindly answered a dental question for me before. Currently, I am wrestling with what would be the healthiest option for a crown for me to have placed on a lower molar (next to last) which has a 30-plus-year-old crown on it and which required dental surgery to remove severe infection so the tooth could be saved. It seems my dentist saved the tooth but he wants me to return in five weeks to remove the old crown and place a new one. He mentioned zirconia but I understand this material is extremely difficult to remove should I have further problems plus I have read there is radioactivity in this material. I considered e.max and then Encore PFM which has 4o% palladium. I am confused over what would be most healthy in the long run and my dental appointment is looming. Dental issues are definitely life changing. Any clarity you can provide me would be so appreciated. Thank you.
– Sandra from Mississippi
We thank our advertisers who help fund this site.
So which is the safest crown? It probably has less to do with the three materials you mentioned and more to do with the expertise with which the crown is crafted. Your greatest danger with a crown, among those three excellent materials, will be with recurrent decay, which will be minimized by having a precisely fitting crown. And if your dentist was able to save this tooth from a severe infection, that’s a good sign that he may have the skills to make an excellent, well-fitting crown.
Yes, there are trace amounts of radioactivity in zirconia. Some zirconia materials used in dentistry are refined to minimize that radioactivity. But even without that, the amount is extremely small. There is also radioactivity of a similar amount in brick, stone, and concrete. Actually, there is even some radioactivity in water.
Of a greater concern is the rare occurrence of allergic sensitivity of some people to zirconia. This is very rare, but it does happen. And yes, zirconia is very difficult to remove, but that is the dentist’s problem, not yours. He or she may wear out a diamond bur or two trying to get it off if that ever becomes necessary, but that won’t hurt your tooth any. The e.max crowns are also difficult to remove, porcelain fused to metal not so much.
If you are allergic to a lot of things, the crown material that you have mentioned with no reports of sensitivity that I am aware of is e.max. This crown is made of a lithium disilicate core veneered with feldspathic porcelain. It can be made highly aesthetic. But if you want the safest, longest-lasting crown on a lower first molar, cast gold would be the material of choice. Whether or not that would show would depend on how wide your smile is. I have crowns on three of my second molars, and they are all cast gold. Gold can be cast to a very fine margin, won’t ever break under the most severe oral stresses, and is extremely biocompatible. After gold, the strongest material for a crown for a molar would be zirconia.
– Dr. Hall
Do you have a comment or anything else to add? We’d love to hear from you. Enter your comment below.
Click here to ask Dr. Hall a question of your own.